You are here:
Rodney Dangerfield: Nothin' Goes Right

Rodney Dangerfield: Nothin' Goes Right

1988

NC-17

Director

Walter C. Miller

Runtime

62 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Rodney Dangerfield hosts a showcase of comics including himself, Robert Schimmel, Bill Hicks, and Andrew Dice Clay, among others.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.8/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The special lacks explicit LGBTQ+ character arcs or narratives. While performers like Bill Hicks often engaged in social commentary, the content relies on traditional comedic tropes of the era.

Gender Representation

Limited

The lineup is heavily male-dominated, centering on male perspectives. There is no evidence of significant subversion of gender roles or the centering of female agency.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast reflects the conventional industry standards of the late 1980s. The primary demographic presented does not reflect a non-white or multi-ethnic majority.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film functions as a celebration of individual talent within a standard commercial format. It does not explicitly prioritize anti-Western or anti-capitalist institutional critiques.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of performers or characters navigating visible or invisible disabilities. The focus remains strictly on the verbal delivery and personas of the comedians.

Strengths

  • Includes performers like Bill Hicks who are known for engaging in social commentary and challenging norms.

Areas for Improvement

  • The male-dominated lineup reinforces traditional gender hierarchies.
  • The cast lacks significant racial and ethnic diversity.
  • There is a complete absence of representation for individuals with disabilities.
  • The content lacks explicit LGBTQ+ narratives or character arcs.

AI Analysis

This comedy showcase serves as a time capsule of late-1980s stand-up, adhering to the demographic and thematic hierarchies of its era. The structure prioritizes individual comedic personas over intersectional storytelling or systemic representation. While the inclusion of provocative performers suggests some level of social commentary, the work lacks the intentionality needed to disrupt established social power dynamics. It remains a traditional, male-centric production. Ultimately, the special functions as a commercial showcase of established talent rather than a vehicle for diverse or subversive narratives.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.