You are here:

Moonwalkers

Moonwalkers

Representation Score

2.9/10

Limited

2015

R

Director

Antoine Bardou-Jacquet

Runtime

107 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Moonwalkers is a genre-driven exercise in historical revisionism and conspiracy satire. It successfully challenges the official Western narrative of the space race, offering a skeptical look at institutional credibility. However, the film prioritizes political subversion over the representation of diverse social groups. The narrative architecture focuses on the mechanics of a grand deception rather than the overlapping aspects of identity. Ultimately, the film functions as a postmodern comedic lens on history, but it lacks depth in its portrayal of diverse human experiences.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Moonwalkers have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include explicit representations of LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex relationships. The story focuses on a partnership between a CIA agent and a band manager within a traditional framework.

How does Moonwalkers portray gender?

Fair

The plot relies on conventional masculine archetypes in espionage and the music industry. Characters navigate high-stakes scenarios using typical masculine roles without significant subversion of gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Moonwalkers?

Limited

Set in 1960s London, the film follows the standard demographic depictions of that era. There is no indication of a non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast used to disrupt the setting.

How does Moonwalkers represent religion and culture?

Fair

The narrative offers a satirical critique of state-sponsored truth by questioning the Apollo 11 moon landing. It deconstructs Western institutional integrity without explicitly promoting anti-religious or anti-capitalist ideologies.

Does Moonwalkers include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no visible or invisible disabilities that serve as central drivers for the character arcs or the plot's progression.

Present on Screen

  • Effectively deconstructs Western institutional integrity through a satirical lens.
  • Provides a sophisticated critique of state-sponsored truth and historical grand narratives.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks meaningful representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight characters.
  • Relies on conventional masculine archetypes rather than subverting gender hierarchies.
  • Does not utilize racial or ethnic diversity to disrupt its historical period setting.

Official Synopsis

What if Apollo 11 never actually made it? What if, in reality, Stanley Kubrick secretly shot the famous images of the moon landing in a studio, working for the US administration? This is the premise of a totally plausible conspiracy theory that takes us to swinging sixties London, where a stubborn CIA agent will never find Kubrick but is forced to team up with a lousy manager of a seedy rock band to develop the biggest con of all time.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.