You are here:

It Was In May

Name: It Was In May
Director: Marlen Khutsiyev
Released: 1970
Duration: 110 min

Representation Score

2.8/10

Limited

1970

Director

Marlen Khutsiyev

Runtime

110 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Marlen Khutsiyev’s work moves away from the rigid, didactic structures of Socialist Realism to focus on psychological interiority. By prioritizing the individual's emotional landscape, the film offers a more nuanced, humanistic perspective than typical state-mandated war epics. However, the film lacks specific demographic markers. It does not feature LGBTQ+ representation or characters with disabilities, and the casting appears largely homogeneous, reflecting the era's regional focus. This limits its multi-layered breadth. Ultimately, the film's value lies in its departure from heavy-handed propaganda. It functions as a lyrical character study that explores the human condition through personal trauma rather than patriotic triumphalism.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does It Was In May have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer narratives. It focuses on the impact of war and interpersonal relationships within a Soviet military setting.

How does It Was In May portray gender?

Fair

Female characters are given psychological depth and play significant roles in driving the story, rather than being used as mere symbols. This approach challenges traditional stereotypes of women as passive victims or patriotic icons.

How racially and ethnically diverse is It Was In May?

Limited

The narrative centers on a specific farmyard and Red Army soldiers, reflecting the homogeneous casting common to regional Soviet dramas of this era. There is no significant non-Anglo-Saxon majority casting.

How does It Was In May represent religion and culture?

Good

The film prioritizes subjective morality and existential struggle over religious or state dogma. It emphasizes humanistic values and the fragility of human structures through a poetic cinematic lens.

Does It Was In May include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no documented evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities serving as central agents or plot drivers in this work.

Present on Screen

Focuses on the psychological depth and ability to act of female characters, challenging traditional war movie clichés.
Uses a sophisticated, humanistic approach to explore individual emotional landscapes rather than relying on state-driven propaganda.
Explores subjective morality and existential struggle through a poetic cinematic lens.

Limited or Absent

Does not include representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight-centered narratives.
Reflects limited racial and ethnic diversity due to the homogeneous casting of the era.
Provides no representation of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

Official Synopsis

A few days after the unconditional surrender of German troops, a group of Soviet soldiers is billeted at a farmyard which the war somehow never seems to have reached. This apparently peaceful picture is eerily undermined when the Red Army soldiers are confronted with the full extent of Nazi terror.

How are these scores produced? →