You are here:
A Crooked Somebody

A Crooked Somebody

2018

R

Director

Trevor White

Runtime

102 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

An attention-seeking psychic is kidnapped and tries to use the situation to boost his popularity.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.9/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film focuses on the interpersonal dynamics between the protagonist, his girlfriend, and his captor. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative gender identities or narratives engaging with queer theory.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story centers on a deceptive male protagonist whose credibility is undermined by dishonesty. Chelsea provides agency as a critical participant in the deception, and her disillusionment serves as a plot pivot.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

Casting includes Clifton Collins Jr. in a central, high-agency role. Placing a character of color as the narrative driver disrupts conventional tropes where such roles are often relegated to secondary positions.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative critiques the intersection of spirituality and capitalism through a fake psychic. It also explores the breakdown of the traditional family unit and the subjectivity of moral truth.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no documented evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film's plot or characters.

Strengths

  • Subverts traditional masculine authority by portraying the 'expert' protagonist as fraudulent.
  • Features high-agency casting for characters of color, avoiding secondary stereotypes.
  • Critiques the intersection of spirituality and capitalism through a postmodern lens.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks any representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer narratives.
  • Provides no documented engagement with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
  • Focuses heavily on a narrow set of interpersonal dynamics.

AI Analysis

A Crooked Somebody is a character study centered on deception and moral ambiguity. It avoids traditional tropes by portraying masculine authority as fraudulent and inept, rather than inherently stable. The film finds progressive value in its skepticism of the spiritual industry and its deconstruction of performative identity. It moves away from idealized social structures, focusing instead on the instability of family and professional credibility. However, the film lacks engagement with LGBTQ+ or disability representation, remaining focused on a narrow set of interpersonal conflicts.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.