
Memorial Day
2011

1951
NRDirector
Robert Pirosh
Runtime
92 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A tribute to the U.S. 442nd Regimental Combat Team, formed in 1943 by Presidential permission with Japanese-American volunteers. We follow the training of a platoon under the rueful command of Lt. Mike Grayson who shares common prejudices of the time. The 442nd serve in Italy, then France, distinguishing themselves in skirmishes and battles; gradually and naturally, Grayson's prejudices evaporate with dawning realization that his men are better soldiers than he is.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film adheres to the social constraints of its era. There are no identified LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative narratives present.
Gender Representation
The plot centers almost exclusively on male combat experiences and military leadership. It lacks female agency or presence, remaining rooted in conventional masculine heroism.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film provides exceptional representation by centering a Nisei cast in positions of high agency. It uses the 442nd Regimental Combat Team to challenge prevailing racial prejudices.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative highlights the gap between American ideals and the reality of racial oppression. It critiques the failure of democratic institutions through the depiction of internment camps.
Disability Representation
No specific depictions of visible or invisible disabilities are identified within the film.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Go for Broke! is a significant historical document that disrupts mid-century cinematic hierarchies. By centering Japanese American soldiers as the primary drivers of military excellence, the film challenges the traditional white protagonist norm of its era. The narrative achieves depth by acknowledging systemic injustice through the depiction of internment camps. This creates a complex tension between the characters' pursuit of citizenship and the failures of the institutions they serve. However, the film remains a product of its time regarding social structures. The lack of gender diversity and the absence of LGBTQ+ representation moderate the overall impact of its progressive racial centering.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.