You are here:

Hazard Jack

Name: Hazard Jack
Director: David Worth
Released: 2014
Duration: 81 min

Representation Score

4.2/10

Fair

2014

Director

David Worth

Runtime

81 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Hazard Jack functions primarily as a survival thriller that prioritizes established genre clichés over nuanced storytelling. The narrative structure leans heavily on conventional archetypes rather than social commentary. The film lacks intentionality in challenging social hierarchies. Instead, it utilizes mental health struggles as a plot driver for tension, which limits the depth of its characterizations. Overall, the production offers a standard genre experience that misses opportunities for nuanced representation of underrepresented identities or systemic critique.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Hazard Jack have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film adheres to a traditional, straight-centered framework typical of survival horror. There are no LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-cisgender identities.

How does Hazard Jack portray gender?

Fair

The cast relies on conventional genre archetypes. There is no indication of a deliberate challenge to traditional gender roles or the 'final girl' cliché.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Hazard Jack?

Limited

The narrative lacks information about a diverse or color-blind casting approach. There are no actively leading characters of color present in the provided context.

How does Hazard Jack represent religion and culture?

Limited

The story focuses on individual psychological struggles rather than systemic critiques. It does not frame Western institutions or traditional morality as corrupt or oppressive.

Does Hazard Jack include disability representation?

Limited

A central character's PTSD and delusions serve as a catalyst for the horror plot. This risks using mental illness as a mere device for antagonism.

Present on Screen

The film explores themes of mental instability and isolation through its central character.

Limited or Absent

The narrative relies on neurodivergence as a tool for antagonism rather than providing nuanced complexity.
The film lacks diverse casting and fails to challenge traditional gender or straight-centered clichés.
There is a missed opportunity to critique systemic power dynamics or socio-political structures.

Official Synopsis

A group of college kids get together for a weekend of booze and war games at an abandoned hospital. The hospital has become the haven for a PTSD stricken war vet coping and acting upon his delusions. Who will survive the game?

How are these scores produced? →