You are here:

Cleveland Versus Wall Street

Name: Cleveland Versus Wall Street
Director: Jean-Stéphane Bron
Released: 2010
Duration: 94 min

Representation Score

5.7/10

Fair

2010

Director

Jean-Stéphane Bron

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Jean-Stéphane Bron’s documentary serves as a critique of institutional power, focusing on the deconstruction of macro-economic forces and the legal battle between Cleveland and Wall Street. It excels in cultural representation, presenting the economic crisis as a moral struggle between local citizens and global capital. However, the film lacks demographic diversity, operating within a traditional, masculine-dominated framework that does not fully address multi-layered issues.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Cleveland Versus Wall Street have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not prominently feature LGBTQ+ identities or non-conforming gender expressions. Instead, it focuses on the legal and economic systems involved.

How does Cleveland Versus Wall Street portray gender?

Limited

The documentary highlights traditional masculine roles in legal and financial fields. It does not show much evidence of women taking significant control or challenging gender power structures.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Cleveland Versus Wall Street?

Fair

Race is mostly related to class-based conflicts. Although underrepresented communities were heavily impacted, the film does not actively use multi-layered narratives to explain its points.

How does Cleveland Versus Wall Street represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film effectively presents the subprime crisis as a universal story about capitalism. It criticizes Western institutions and the harmful nature of global financial systems.

Does Cleveland Versus Wall Street include disability representation?

Limited

There is no significant focus on disabilities, either visible or invisible. The film concentrates on socioeconomic status and legal struggles rather than physical or neurological differences.

Present on Screen

Offers a sophisticated critique of Western financial institutions and global capitalism.
Frames the economic crisis as a moral struggle between local citizens and global capital.
Examines how macro-economic forces impact individual lives.

Limited or Absent

Does not provide visibility for LGBTQ+ identities and non-conforming gender expressions.
Focuses on masculine-dominated professional sectors, reinforcing conventional gender hierarchies.
Does not actively use multi-layered narratives or diverse casting to explore racial dynamics.

Official Synopsis

On 11th January 2008, hired by the City of Cleveland, lawyer Josh Cohen and his team filed a lawsuit against 21 banks, which they held accountable for the wave of foreclosures that had left their city in ruins. Since then, the bankers on Wall Street have been fighting by with all available means to avoid going to court. This film is the story of that trial. A film about a trial that may never be held but in which the facts, the participants and their testimonies are all real: the judge, lawyers, witnesses, even the members of the jury - asked to give their verdict - play their own roles. Step by step, one witness after another, the film takes apart, from a plain, human perspective, the mechanisms of subprime mortgage loans, a system that sent the world economy reeling. A trial for the sake of example, a universal fable about capitalism

How are these scores produced? →