You are here:
The Forgotten City of the Planet of the Apes

The Forgotten City of the Planet of the Apes

1980

Not Rated

Director

Bernard McEveety, Don McDougall

Runtime

95 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Human astronauts Burke and Virdon, with their chimp companion Galen, are forced to become involved in the strange gladiatorial games of the district run by prefect Tolar. The trio escape the gorilla police and find an abandoned government research project with a computer containing a vast amount of recording information about the old human-ruled world. [The second of five telefilms edited from episodes of the 1974 TV series; this film combines the episodes "The Gladiators" and "The Legacy"]

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.9/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities. The narrative focus remains strictly on a male-dominated trio of astronauts and a chimpanzee companion.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story centers on a traditional masculine trio, leaving female characters without visible agency. This reliance on conventional gendered tropes limits the film's gender diversity.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

Species-based hierarchies serve as metaphors for racial and ethnic stratification. The inclusion of Galen the chimpanzee alongside humans suggests a narrative exploration of social integration.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film critiques historical legacies through the discovery of records from a fallen human civilization. It explores systemic conflict by depicting an oppressive, centralized ape hierarchy.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no mention of characters navigating physical, sensory, or neurodivergent challenges. No representation of disability is present in the narrative.

Strengths

  • Uses species-based hierarchies as effective metaphors for social and ethnic stratification.
  • Explores themes of institutional corruption and the fragility of established civilizations.
  • Provides a critique of centralized authority through its depiction of oppressive ape rule.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks female characters in positions of agency or leadership.
  • Provides no visible representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer subtext.
  • Fails to include characters navigating physical or neurodivergent challenges.

AI Analysis

The film operates as a standard science-fiction genre piece that utilizes species-based metaphors to explore systemic power and institutional corruption. While it offers some thematic depth regarding the collapse of human civilization, it lacks intersectional breadth. The narrative is heavily skewed toward a masculine perspective, focusing on a trio of male astronauts. This absence of female agency and queer identity results in low scores for gender and LGBTQ+ representation. Ultimately, the work succeeds in using its setting to critique social hierarchies, but it fails to provide diverse, identity-based character representation.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.