You are here:

Good to Go

Name: Good to Go
Director: Matevž Luzar
Released: 2013
Duration: 100 min

Representation Score

6.2/10

Good

2013

Director

Matevž Luzar

Runtime

100 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Good to Go is a localized character study that prioritizes existential themes over demographic diversity. It successfully challenges sentimentalized clichés about aging and family, offering a more cynical and nuanced perspective on mortality. However, the film remains narrow in its focus. The narrative is heavily centered on male experiences and a homogeneous Slovenian setting, limiting characters who reflect more than one aspect of diversity and diverse cultural perspectives. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its psychological depth rather than its social diversity, making it a specific study of individual experiences rather than a broad social tapestry.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Good to Go have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film does not include any explicit references to LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The story revolves around an older male character facing existential questions without delving into non-straight relationships.

How does Good to Go portray gender?

Fair

The story centers on male relationships, particularly the tension between a father and his son. It explores traditional masculine roles but does not give much attention to elevating female characters.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Good to Go?

Limited

Set in Slovenia, the film seems to depict a relatively uniform demographic. There is no indication of multicultural elements or diverse racial casting in the Alpine setting.

How does Good to Go represent religion and culture?

Good

The film challenges clichés about aging by focusing on a protagonist who is disillusioned with traditional family structures. It emphasizes existentialism over religious or societal views on success.

Does Good to Go include disability representation?

Fair

While no specific physical disabilities are highlighted, the film addresses the psychological challenges of cognitive and emotional aging. Characters with disabilities do not have much control over their situations.

Present on Screen

Challenges sentimentalized clichés about the dignity and wisdom of the elderly.
Offers a nuanced, existential critique of conventional family structures and success metrics.
Explores the psychological complexities of aging realistically.

Limited or Absent

Does not include significant representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight themes.
The narrative focus is heavily skewed toward male interpersonal dynamics and experiences.
The setting and cast reflect a homogeneous demographic with minimal multicultural diversity.

Official Synopsis

Ivan is a retired music teacher in his late 70s, and has grown weary of life. His estranged son never matched up to his expectations anyway, he is still eaten up with jealousy of his brother, who always enjoys life to the full, and - above all - he cannot keep up with the changes around him. He buys himself a plot in a graveyard with an beautiful view of the Alps and checks into a retirement home so he can wait for his death in peace. However, the exact opposite happens: for the first time in his life Ivan starts to actually live.

How are these scores produced? →