You are here:

Lupin the 3rd: Goemon's Blood Spray

Name: Lupin the 3rd: Goemon's Blood Spray
Director: Takeshi Koike
Released: 2017
Duration: 54 min

2017

Director

Takeshi Koike

Runtime

54 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A yakuza boss hires Goemon Ishikawa, a modern day samurai, to protect him aboard his cruise ship casino. Everything goes sideways when the famous thief, Lupin the Third, tries to rob the vessel. Lupin's being hunted by a powerful and mysterious man: the so called “Ghost of Bermuda.” With Goemon's employer dead in the ensuing chaos, his honor is at stake, and the only way to preserve it is with blood. But this opponent is like no other, and to make things right, Goemon may need to sharpen not only his sword, but himself as well!

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.7/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film follows a traditional action framework. There are no non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy present in the character arcs.

Gender Representation

Fair

Fujiko Mine operates with significant autonomy, using her intellect to navigate a male-dominated world. However, the central conflict relies heavily on traditional masculine displays of strength.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The story centers on Japanese cultural frameworks like the samurai and Yakuza. It avoids Western-centric homogeneity but lacks significant racial blending or intersectional casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative explores moral relativism through professional thieves and a wandering samurai. It critiques rigid societal structures by centering characters who live by personal codes.

Disability Representation

Minimal

No visible or invisible disabilities are portrayed within the primary ensemble. Disability is not used as a plot device in this story.

Strengths

Fujiko Mine displays significant autonomy and agency, disrupting expectations of female passivity.
The narrative offers a sophisticated exploration of moral relativism and personal ethics.
The film avoids Western-centric homogeneity by centering non-Western historical archetypes.

Areas for Improvement

The film lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative gender expressions.
There is no portrayal of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
The central conflict relies heavily on traditional masculine displays of martial prowess.

AI Analysis

The film prioritizes stylistic genre deconstruction over explicit demographic representation. It succeeds in granting agency to its female lead and exploring complex moral relativism through its outsider protagonists. However, the work remains anchored in traditional archetypes. The lack of intersectional breadth and the absence of diverse identity representations keep the score in a moderate range.

How are these scores produced? →