You are here:

Pushing Dead

Name: Pushing Dead
Director: Tom E. Brown
Released: 2016
Duration: 108 min

Representation Score

6.3/10

Good

2016

TV-MA

Director

Tom E. Brown

Runtime

108 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Pushing Dead is a character-driven social commentary that prioritizes the lived experience of a underrepresented individual. The narrative uses the protagonist's medical status to critique the intersection of healthcare and capitalism. The film excels in its portrayal of long-term illness and systemic critique. It moves beyond surface-level inclusion by highlighting the administrative and economic hurdles faced by those living with HIV. However, the film's scope is narrow. The lack of information regarding racial identity and gender dynamics leaves significant gaps in its overall representation profile.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Pushing Dead have LGBTQ+ representation?

Good

The film centers on a long-term HIV survivor, exploring the lived experiences of the LGBTQ community. It provides a detailed look at the intersection of queer identity and long-term medical survival.

How does Pushing Dead portray gender?

Fair

The narrative focuses on the protagonist's struggle against bureaucracy and health economics. It remains unclear how the film addresses gender dynamics or interpersonal relationships.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Pushing Dead?

Minimal

The story does not specify the racial or ethnic identity of the lead or supporting cast. Therefore, the film's approach to racial diversity remains unaddressed.

How does Pushing Dead represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The plot critiques Western institutions by presenting a helpless bureaucracy as the main antagonist. It highlights the tension between individual survival and systemic failures like capitalism.

Does Pushing Dead include disability representation?

Excellent

By focusing on the practical frustrations of managing a chronic illness, the film explores invisible disabilities. It avoids clichés by emphasizing the character's proactive response to his struggle for survival.

Present on Screen

Provides a nuanced look at the intersection of queer identity and long-term medical survival.
Offers a sharp critique of institutional reliability and the failures of modern bureaucracy.
Avoids disability clichés by focusing on the realistic, pragmatic struggles of managing chronic illness.

Limited or Absent

Lacks clarity regarding the racial and ethnic identities of the characters.
Provides no insight into how gender dynamics or hierarchies are addressed within the story.

Official Synopsis

When a struggling writer, HIV positive for 20+ years, accidentally deposits a $100 birthday check, he is dropped from his health plan for earning too much. In this new era of sort-of universal care, can he take on a helpless bureaucracy or come up with $3000 a month to buy meds on his own?

How are these scores produced? →