You are here:
Yes

Yes

2025

Director

Nadav Lapid

Runtime

152 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In the days following October 7, Y., a jazz musician, and his wife Yasmin, a dancer, resolve to say yes to everything. Y. and Yasmin sell their bodies and souls to the highest bidder, surrendering themselves and their art to Israel’s social, political and military elite. Soon, Y. is entrusted with a mission of the utmost importance: to compose the music for a rousing, ruthless new national anthem.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.6/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film explores non-traditional social bonds and fluid interpersonal relationships following national trauma. While these dynamics suggest a departure from heteronormative stability, the narrative does not center queer identity as a primary plot driver.

Gender Representation

Good

Female characters like Yasmin and Leah act as active participants in a high-stakes social ecosystem. The film avoids domestic tropes, instead presenting women with significant agency and moral ambiguity within their partnerships.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

A diverse international cast reflects a complex, multi-ethnic social strata. The inclusion of a Russian oligarch introduces globalized power dynamics that extend beyond the specific regional tensions of the setting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The narrative excels at critiquing nationalistic institutions and state-sponsored music. It portrays patriotism as a tool for systemic manipulation, deconstructing the sanctity of national identity through a sophisticated, anti-establishment lens.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no documented evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities being utilized as central plot devices or being portrayed with specific agency.

Strengths

  • Subverts traditional gender hierarchies by giving female characters significant agency and complex roles.
  • Offers a sophisticated critique of nationalistic institutions and the manipulation of state-sponsored art.
  • Utilizes an international cast to reflect a multi-ethnic and globalized social strata.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit depictions of queer identity as a central or driving narrative force.
  • Provides no documented representation or agency for characters with disabilities.
  • Focus remains heavily localized, limiting the breadth of racial and ethnic exploration.

AI Analysis

The film functions as a biting satire that deconstructs the relationship between art and the state. It succeeds most prominently in its cultural critique, using the commission of a bellicose anthem to challenge nationalistic sanctity. While the cast provides international texture, the narrative remains deeply rooted in specific regional socio-political tensions. Gender representation is a notable strength, as female characters navigate survival with significant agency rather than serving as domestic background figures. However, the film lacks explicit focus on queer identities or disability representation. It prioritizes the friction between individual agency and systemic pressure over broader social identity explorations.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.